Skip to main content

Undeserving CEOs get 900% salary hikes

With the Indian economy slowing down in FY09, many of us felt the pinch in terms of shrinking wallets and rampant cost cutting exercises by corporates leading to the ever palpable fear of job losses. But there were certain people who appeared to have a field day during the year gone by. Yes, I am talking about CEOs of real estate companies, who took pay hikes of nearly 2-10 times despite their respective companies facing a decline in both revenues and profits.

In fact, the salary hikes of some of the top real estate companies were greater in FY09 when their businesses were considerably impacted by the economic slowdown.

I find the intentions of these managements really appalling. There is a brilliant email doing rounds about confession of a job hopper which talks about these great CEOs. Good management practices call for giving due consideration to the interests of shareholders and customers first, but real estate CEOs seem more concerned about building their booty. It did not matter to them that the performance of their respective companies was nothing much to talk about during that year. A strong management is a qualitative factor to be considered while investing in equities. Therefore, while it not simple to attribute any number to the same, certain facts mentioned in annual reports do give some idea.

In fact, annual reports of companies disclose the pay packages that the top brass takes home and should definitely be looked at while studying annual reports. As investors, do you give due consideration to the pay packets that CEOs take home?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Insight from the new book "The story of work" by Jan Lucassen. Work that never ends

The more things change, its turn out to be the  same as it ever was.  A new book about the history of work reveals that today’s workers have much in common with all those who have come before them over the past 12,000 years.  People’s appetites drive them to produce more than they need, and they build political and economic institutions to help them do it. Then those institutions drive them to do more. NYT ( see the story in the link)  also talks about  Gluttons for punishment.  We work so much because we want so much. That was anthropologist James Suzman’s conclusion after studying hunter-gatherers in the Kalahari Desert who satisfied their survival needs with roughly 15 hours of weekly labor. But modern, urban societies cause us to develop unlimited desires, which lead us to endless labour https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/29/podcasts/transcript-ezra-klein-interviews-james-suzman.html?cid=other-eml-onp-mip-mck&hlkid=38845d000b404e829c41b7395739f39a&...

Hedge Funds: Shape up or ship out

With markets testing their mettle, the new mantra for hedge funds is ‘perform or pay back’! - a la shapeup or ship out. Hedge funds that enjoyed a one-sided bargain with their clients in reaping handsome fees now need to pull up their socks. For if they don’t, they will be losing some of their biggest clients. As per Wall Street Journal, the California Public Employees' Retirement System, popularly known as Calpers, that is one of the biggest investors in hedge funds, is demanding better terms from funds. This includes lower fees and claw-back of fees if performance weakens. For the uninitiated, the US$ 172 bn pension fund is a bellwether in the money-management business. A Calpers investment can in fact help money managers like hedge funds attract other clients. This move by Calpers therefore underscores the changing dynamics between hedge funds and their clients. Just a couple of years ago, investors clamored to get an entry into these funds, agreeing to pay fees that in some cas...

Biyani looks at the bigger picture

It is important to look at the holistic picture and have an individual opinion rather than get swayed away by the public consensus. This is the view of the man who pioneered the retailing boom in India - Mr. Kishore Biyani, the founder of India’s largest retailing company - Pantaloon. In an article in the Wall street Journal, Mr. Biyani wrote, "Almost daily doses of bad news on television screens and newspapers have possibly done as much damage to the economy as the events on either side of the Atlantic." I completely agree with him. Mr. Biyani’s predicament is based on the fact that an overwhelming majority of Indian consumers are self-employed, who can neither get laid off nor can have pay cuts. Consider some statistics he has provided. The share of the national income represented by proprietor-run concerns and partnerships is 35%. The share of companies is around 15%, government around 25%, and agriculture around 25%. Combine agriculture and the self-employed in industry a...