Skip to main content

Q4 FY 22 EARNINGS ANALYSIS - Moderates to 7 Quarter Low. Headwinds ahead

Q4FY22 earnings are likely to moderate AT 12% YoY; this will be a SEVEN-QUARTER LOW.  

The reason for moderation would be commodities, reconciling its divergence with overall aggregate. While Banks, exporters (chemicals, IT) and consumer services are likely to report strong earnings, however, consumer companies are likely to remain muted, largely due to soft demand.

There are more adverse macro and fading tailwinds of global reflation, market share gains and lower credit costs pose downside risk to estimates of FY23.

Demand – rather than margins – looks more vulnerable. 

Earnings growth moderates 

1. Led by commodities…
Earnings growth is likely to moderate in Q4FY22 to 12% YoY for our coverage universe. The moderation is likely to be mainly led by commodities (key earnings driver so far), while the uptick in rest is not material enough to offset commodity slowdown. 

In non-commodities, unlocking has propelled consumer services’ profits. Exporters (chemicals, IT) too are likely to report continued strength. Meanwhile, lower credit costs YoY are likely to continue to aid banks’ profits. Price hikes taken may support some domestic consumer companies’ earnings, but they are likely to stay weak at large. Industrial companies are likely to report an uptick in execution.

2. …but its demand dynamics are worrying
Margin pressures are stabilising sequentially (although still down YoY); however demand dynamics are far more worrying. Despite price hikes, top line (ex-commodities) is likely to remain stable at 11–12% YoY (similar to WPI manufacturing). 

Real growth is likely to moderate across the board as price hikes amid weak sentiments and fading pent-up weigh on demand. Even in BFSI, while loan growth is likely to accelerate, top line may not as NIMs moderate, asset growth remains stable and lower treasury gains weigh on other income. Exporters (chemicals, IT) remain one of the stronger demand centres.


For FY23, the environment is even more challenging 

1) commodity supply shock; 

2) fading global reflation, which could weigh on exporters’ earnings; 

3) tailwinds from market share gains and lower banking sector credit costs having passed

4) potential moderation in urban wages. However, the rural economy is likely to fare better given higher food prices.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Biyani looks at the bigger picture

It is important to look at the holistic picture and have an individual opinion rather than get swayed away by the public consensus. This is the view of the man who pioneered the retailing boom in India - Mr. Kishore Biyani, the founder of India’s largest retailing company - Pantaloon. In an article in the Wall street Journal, Mr. Biyani wrote, "Almost daily doses of bad news on television screens and newspapers have possibly done as much damage to the economy as the events on either side of the Atlantic." I completely agree with him. Mr. Biyani’s predicament is based on the fact that an overwhelming majority of Indian consumers are self-employed, who can neither get laid off nor can have pay cuts. Consider some statistics he has provided. The share of the national income represented by proprietor-run concerns and partnerships is 35%. The share of companies is around 15%, government around 25%, and agriculture around 25%. Combine agriculture and the self-employed in industry a...

Infosys kick started the March quarter and full year FY09 result season today on a mixed note

Infosys kick started the March quarter and full year FY09 result season today on a mixed note. Although its fourth quarter operating performance did not have much to be enthused about, the company managed to add 37 new clients and 1,772 employees (net) during this quarter. This goes to show the consistency in the company’s long term business prospects. While the full year profits grew by a healthy 29% YoY, the company announced an earnings guidance for FY10 that would be lower by 3% to 7% YoY as compared to FY09 EPS.

Insight from the new book "The story of work" by Jan Lucassen. Work that never ends

The more things change, its turn out to be the  same as it ever was.  A new book about the history of work reveals that today’s workers have much in common with all those who have come before them over the past 12,000 years.  People’s appetites drive them to produce more than they need, and they build political and economic institutions to help them do it. Then those institutions drive them to do more. NYT ( see the story in the link)  also talks about  Gluttons for punishment.  We work so much because we want so much. That was anthropologist James Suzman’s conclusion after studying hunter-gatherers in the Kalahari Desert who satisfied their survival needs with roughly 15 hours of weekly labor. But modern, urban societies cause us to develop unlimited desires, which lead us to endless labour https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/29/podcasts/transcript-ezra-klein-interviews-james-suzman.html?cid=other-eml-onp-mip-mck&hlkid=38845d000b404e829c41b7395739f39a&...