Skip to main content

Analyst view of UPA win !

With the UPA regaining power, this time without the Left’s support, what does it mean for India?
No more political instability risk for India; the new government poised to complete its 5-year term successfully.
Near-term positive because of smooth transition – this is more like an extension of UPA’s term. In the event of any other party/alliance coming to power, it would have taken some time for the new government to formulate its policies.
UPA to continue with its policies with more power in hand now; no fear of strange coalitions or drag of the communist parties anymore.

Near-term positive for the markets
Equity markets are likely to open with a big gap up on Monday, as desperation to deploy excess cash (both by DIIs and FIIs) will be high. While FIIs may show interest in large caps, DIIs may hunt for beta (chasing mid caps).
India has underperformed other emerging markets (EM) YTD because of election concerns. However, stable government at home and strong global liquidity are likely to drive India’s outperformance hereon. Expecting Nifty to rally to ~4200 level in the near-term. Further upside for individual large cap stocks will depend on other triggers.
Markets in the medium to long term will remain linked largely to global liquidity and economic recovery. New government’s policy initiatives (or lack of it), will determine India’s relative under-performance/out-performance vis-à-vis other EMs.
Bond market is likely to rally in the near-term, as fiscal deficit concerns reduce for the moment (with no possibility of Third Front coming to power now). Equity is likely to get re-priced upwards.
INR to appreciate, as India’s sovereign risk diminishes with political stability. Continued FII inflows will also push INR up.

Economic reforms may speed up; fiscal concerns remain
FDI inflows into the country over the next 6-12 months can improve as India gets to play a larger role in G20 and the stability of the India model is better appreciated.
Areas like insurance may see an upsurge.
Government is likely to continue to boost credit to support growth.
Budget (possibly in July) is the next key event and markets may actually be sluggish around that time.
Fiscal deficit in the medium-term is likely to remain a concern. Likely large supply of government papers over the next 3-6 months will also put a cap on the market.
Government does not have resources to step up capital expenditure overnight. It is likely to address capital investments by encouraging quasi-government agencies (like NHAI and NHB) and public-private partnerships (PPP).

Rural focus and reforms on UPA’s agenda
Disinvestments - Pressure on fiscal position will push the government for disinvestments, though moves are unlikely to be very aggressive.
Infrastructure - Focus on low-cost housing and power generation.
Focus on rural populace: Improve access to rural credit at lower interest rates; subsidise food for poor; implement NREGA; develop rural infrastructure.
Introduction of GST in FY10.
The UPA may try to focus on fulfilling promises it had made in the past regarding reforms in the banking and insurance sectors.
There is no key state election coming up over the next two years (except Maharashtra), which gives the government additional freedom to take tough stance on tax reforms, infrastructure investments, external policies etc.

Recommend to focus on domestic sectors versus global
Continuation of policies will benefit sectors like:-
Banking and insurance (reforms in the sector)
Power, construction and capital goods (infrastructure investments to continue)
Real estate (cheaper loans, better job market/income outlook may bring demand back)
Telecom (3G auction)
Retail (FDI limit may be raised)
Agro-based industries (continued focus on rural populace)
Financial services (improved capital market outlook and greater market activity)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Learning from #FriendsReunion - Plan Your Bottle Episode

Learning from #FriendsReunion - Plan Your Bottle Episode While watching Friends: The Reunion a while back ( Yes, i am super late, been a very busy week) something  struck with me which the show’s creators said about "budgeting" a term called Bottle Episode.    On Friends - Its one of the most successful television sitcoms of all time. From 1994 to 2004, the show never left the list of top 10 most-watched  television programs.  It was also one of the most expensive television series of all time. By the last two seasons, each of the six main actors earned more than $1 million per episode. From the resources perspective, the show has more than justified that expense since then. As per some estimate Friends earns around $1 billion a year from syndication, merchandising, streaming, and other deals. During the reunion show, creator Marta Kaufman talked about how they planned “bottle episodes” each season to manage the show’s budget....

Insight from the new book "The story of work" by Jan Lucassen. Work that never ends

The more things change, its turn out to be the  same as it ever was.  A new book about the history of work reveals that today’s workers have much in common with all those who have come before them over the past 12,000 years.  People’s appetites drive them to produce more than they need, and they build political and economic institutions to help them do it. Then those institutions drive them to do more. NYT ( see the story in the link)  also talks about  Gluttons for punishment.  We work so much because we want so much. That was anthropologist James Suzman’s conclusion after studying hunter-gatherers in the Kalahari Desert who satisfied their survival needs with roughly 15 hours of weekly labor. But modern, urban societies cause us to develop unlimited desires, which lead us to endless labour https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/29/podcasts/transcript-ezra-klein-interviews-james-suzman.html?cid=other-eml-onp-mip-mck&hlkid=38845d000b404e829c41b7395739f39a&...

Biyani looks at the bigger picture

It is important to look at the holistic picture and have an individual opinion rather than get swayed away by the public consensus. This is the view of the man who pioneered the retailing boom in India - Mr. Kishore Biyani, the founder of India’s largest retailing company - Pantaloon. In an article in the Wall street Journal, Mr. Biyani wrote, "Almost daily doses of bad news on television screens and newspapers have possibly done as much damage to the economy as the events on either side of the Atlantic." I completely agree with him. Mr. Biyani’s predicament is based on the fact that an overwhelming majority of Indian consumers are self-employed, who can neither get laid off nor can have pay cuts. Consider some statistics he has provided. The share of the national income represented by proprietor-run concerns and partnerships is 35%. The share of companies is around 15%, government around 25%, and agriculture around 25%. Combine agriculture and the self-employed in industry a...